RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
"Gender-based Violence (GBV) and HIV, they are like sister and brother"
Barriers and facilitators to GBV screening and referral in public HIV treatment settings in Uganda
Thomas, D., Nalumansi, A., Reichman, M., Metitiri, M., Kamusiime, B., Kasiita, V., Nalukwago, G. K., Kibuuka, J., Nakabugo, L., Nambi, F., Muwonge, T., Simoni, J., Montgomery, E. T., Ware, N., Wyatt, M. A., Mujugira, A., & Heffron, R. (2023). "Gender-based Violence (GBV) and HIV, they are like sister and brother": Barriers and facilitators to GBV screening and referral in public HIV treatment settings in Uganda. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), Article 1383. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10400-2
BACKGROUND: People living with HIV are vulnerable to gender-based violence (GBV), which can negatively impact HIV treatment outcomes. National guidelines in Uganda recommend GBV screening alongside HIV treatment services. We explored barriers and facilitators to providers implementing GBV screening and referral in public antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics in Uganda.
METHODS: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews. Providers were purposively sampled from 12 ART clinics to represent variation in clinical specialty and gender. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework to structure our deductive analysis.
RESULTS: We conducted 30 in-depth interviews with providers implementing GBV screening and/or referral. Respondents had a median age of 36 (IQR: 30, 43) years and had been offering post-GBV care to clients for a median duration of 5 (4, 7) years. 67% of respondents identified as female and 57% were counselors. Facilitators of GBV screening and referral included providers having access to post-GBV standard operating procedures and screening tools, trainings offered by the Ministry of Health, facility-sponsored continuing medical education units and support from colleagues. Respondents indicated that referrals were uncommon, citing the following barriers: negative expectations regarding the quality and quantity of referral services; lack of financial resources to support clients, facilities, and referral partners throughout the referral process; and sociocultural factors that threatened client willingness to pursue post-GBV support services.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this evaluation support the refinement of GBV screening and referral implementation strategies that leverage facilitators and address barriers to better support individuals living with HIV and who may have heightened vulnerability to GBV.
