RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Acceptability of the dapivirine vaginal ring and daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe
Young, A. M., Stoner, M., Mathebula, F., Mohuba, R., Baez, A. B., Seyama, L., Mutero, P., Etima, J., Fabiano, Z., Fairlie, L., Mayo, A., Balkus, J. E., Song, M., Bunge, K., Piper, J. M., Balan, I., Van Der Straten, A., & Montgomery, E. T. (2024). Acceptability of the dapivirine vaginal ring and daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during pregnancy in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. AIDS and Behavior, 28(11), 3615-3628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04421-z
Pregnant and lactating persons in sub-Saharan Africa face a heightened risk of HIV acquisition, due to biological and behavioral factors, combined with limited access to prevention and treatment services. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and the dapivirine vaginal ring are promising tools for HIV prevention, and the ring's recent approval in multiple African countries represents a significant advancement in expanding access to HIV prevention. In a nested qualitative study within the MTN-042 trial, we explored the acceptability of study products among pregnant persons in the second and early third trimesters. Interviews were conducted privately, using a semi-structured guide with 77 participants, in participants' preferred language. Topics explored included product acceptability (using the theoretical framework of acceptability), user experience, satisfaction, disclosure, community attitudes, and sexual activity during pregnancy. Interview transcripts were analyzed using Dedoose software. We observed positive attitudes among participants towards the study products, which they found generally user-friendly, despite the added complexities of using them during pregnancy. Participants recognized that consistent and correct use would provide protection for both them and their unborn children. Although initial concerns existed, most of these worries dissipated over time, with study staff support and increased product use experience. These findings emphasize the importance of continued surveillance, support, and education to ensure the successful rollout of new HIV prevention measures during pregnancy.