RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Why transparency and humility are compatible with health services and public health leadership
Southwell, B. G. (2026). To omit Or not to omit? Why transparency and humility are compatible with health services and public health leadership. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 101377hlthaff202600806. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2026.00806
Professionals who oversee and implement communication efforts related to health services and public health face many challenges and sometimes may be tempted to omit information for a variety of reasons. Three important considerations undermine the case for adopting omission as a regular practice to pursue without caution. Wholesale omission is relatively difficult to correct after the fact; is often unnecessary, given the existence of established conventions to indicate missing information instead of withholding it; and misses opportunities to build trust by acknowledging nuance and uncertainty. We should avoid steering people toward what we think are the optimal perceptions for them to have if those perceptions are not based on accurate comprehension, even if we have legitimate or moral reasons in mind. We also should caution against message simplification without thoughtful justification. Communication benefits from humility: awareness of one's own limits, openness to learning and change, and respect for others' needs.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.