RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Effectiveness and safety of methods to prevent bloodstream and other infections and noninfectious complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters
A systematic review and meta-analysis
Dobrescu, A., Constantin, A. M., Pinte, L., Chapman, A., Ratajczak, P., Klerings, I., Emprechtinger, R., Allegranzi, B., Grayson, M. L., Toledo, J. P., Gartlehner, G., & Nussbaumer-Streit, B. (2025). Effectiveness and safety of methods to prevent bloodstream and other infections and noninfectious complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf063
Background Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have a 29% complication rate. This systematic review evaluated 25 interventions to prevent PICC-associated infectious and noninfectious complications in participants of all ages.Methods We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, CINAHL) and reference lists for randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials published between 1 January 1980-8 May 2024. We dually selected studies, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and rated certainty of evidence (COE). We included single interventions of interest and combinations of at least 2 (bundle/multimodal). If 3 or more RCTs existed, we conducted Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses.Results Seventy-four studies met our eligibility criteria (60 evaluated single interventions, 14 bundle/multimodal), addressing 13 of 25 research questions. The majority were conducted in high-income countries; 36 focused on neonates. Evidence was very uncertain for 11 of the 13 research questions. Stronger COE showed that ultrasound-guided catheter insertion reduced phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in adults compared with non-ultrasound-guided (5 RCTs; risk ratio [RR], 0.19; 95% credible interval, .08-.50); silicone catheters increased phlebitis/thrombophlebitis compared with nonsilicone (1 RCT; RR, 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.17). Bundle interventions decreased local infections (1 RCT; RR, 0.47; 95% CI, .31-.72) and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in adults (1 RCT; RR, 0.35; 95% CI, .22-.56) compared with routine care.Conclusions Ultrasound-guided catheter insertion and nonsilicone catheters effectively prevented PICC complications. The evidence for other comparisons was too uncertain to draw conclusions, highlighting the urgent need for additional studies on prevention and control interventions.Data support 2 preventive measures for reducing peripherally inserted central catheter-associated complications: ultrasound-guided catheter insertion and nonsilicone catheters. Bundle interventions also appear effective. An urgent need exists for additional high-quality studies on this important topic.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.