RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Application of professional best practices in postmortem forensic toxicology
Truver, M. T., Chronister, C. W., Davis, G. G., Gray, T. R., Hartman, R. L., Kahl, J. H., Karschner, E. L., Kerrigan, S., Kronstrand, R., Krotulski, A. J., Lee, D., Logan, B. K., Moore, D. M., Rodda, L. N., Vikingsson, S., Winecker, R. E., & Goldberger, B. A. (2025). Application of professional best practices in postmortem forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf061
Postmortem forensic toxicology plays a critical role in medicolegal death investigations through the identification and quantitation of drugs and other substances in postmortem fluids and tissues. Due to the complexity of this sub-discipline, consistent application of best practices is critical for ensuring accurate and reliable results, particularly in the context of challenges such as emerging novel psychoactive substances, complex poly-drug interactions, postmortem drug redistribution, and analytical limitations inherent with postmortem specimens. Although there has been significant progress in the development of consensus-based forensic toxicology standards, their scope is intentionally broad to accommodate human performance, postmortem, regulated and non-regulated employment drug testing, court-ordered toxicology, and other applications. Consequently, some aspects specific to postmortem toxicology and medicolegal death investigation are not addressed within the standards. This manuscript seeks to fill these gaps by demonstrating how current standards can be applied in a postmortem toxicology setting and presenting best practices in situations where no established standards exist. These best practices will aid laboratories in prioritizing changes to workflows, allocating resources more efficiently, improving analytical accuracy and reproducibility, ensuring interpretative consistency, and strengthening forensic defensibility in administrative and legal proceedings. Key topics addressed include specimen collection and case submission protocols, method validation approaches tailored for postmortem analysis, optimized analytical workflows based on testing scope and case classification, and quality assurance requirements. Considerations for data review, reporting, and result interpretation are discussed in the context of accurate determination of cause and manner of death. Emphasis is placed on integrating toxicological findings with investigative and autopsy information obtained through ongoing communication with stakeholders. By integrating the application of existing consensus standards with the best community practices for postmortem toxicology, this manuscript aims to support the generation of robust and reliable toxicological data, with the goal of improving forensic investigations, public health surveillance, and drug policy development.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.